Prudence versus sophistication in voting strategy
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
a paradigm shift away from method-wise teaching to strategy-wise teaching: an investigation of reconstructive strategy versus communicative strategy
چکیده: هدف اصلی این مطالعه ی توصیفی تحقیقی در حقیقت تلاشی پساروش-گرا به منظور رسیدن به نتیجه ای منطقی در انتخاب مناسبترین راهکار آموزشی بر گرفته از چارچوب راهبردی مطرح شده توسط والدمر مارتن بوده که به بهترین شکل سازگار و مناسب با سامانه ی آموزشی ایران باشد. از این رو، دو راهکار آموزشی، راهکار ارتباطی و راهکار بازساختی، برای تحقیق و بررسی انتخاب شدند. صریحاً اینکه، در راستای هدف اصلی این پژوهش، ر...
15 صفحه اولApproximately Strategy-Proof Voting
The classic Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem establishes that only dictatorial voting rules are strategy-proof; under any other voting rule, players have an incentive to lie about their true preferences. We consider a new approach for circumventing this result: we consider randomized voting rules that only approximate a deterministic voting rule and only are approximately strategy-proof. We show t...
متن کاملStrategy in Range Voting and COAF voting systems
(1) We define “range voting.” (2) More generally we define the wide class of “COAF voting systems,” (3) We reach an understanding of optimum voter strategy in COAF voting systems, at least in a certain probabilistic model, the “Gaussian model,” of how the other voters behave, and in the limit V → ∞ of a large number of voters. (4) This understanding also works for Condorcet and IRV voting (whic...
متن کاملConsensus versus Dichotomous Voting
Consensus means general agreement among possibly di erent views, while dichotomus voting rules are a means of making decisions by using votes to settle di erences of view. How then can it often be the case that a committee whose only formal mechanism for decision-making is a dichotomus voting rule reaches a consensus? In this paper, based on a game-theoretic model developed in three previous pa...
متن کاملRegional Voting versus
| This paper examines and compares the merits and demerits of the national (global) and the regional (partitioned) voting system where the national voting selects a candidate directly by a simple majority of the entire voting population of the nation while the regional voting chooses the candidate indirectly by a majority of the regions, not by the majority of the entire votes. And we demonstra...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Economic Theory
سال: 1981
ISSN: 0022-0531
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(81)90076-4